Early Versus Interval Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Acute Cholecystitis: A Prospective Comparative Cross-Sectional Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51168/bbaygb91Keywords:
Acute cholecystitis, early laparoscopic cholecystectomy, interval cholecystectomy, conversion, postoperative complications, hospital stayAbstract
Background:
Acute cholecystitis is commonly managed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy, but the timing of surgery remains clinically relevant because acute inflammation can increase technical difficulty while delayed surgery requires a second treatment episode.
Objectives:
To compare early and interval laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis with respect to operative feasibility, intraoperative difficulty, conversion to open surgery, postoperative complications, and hospital stay.
Methods:
This prospective comparative cross-sectional study included 50 adults treated in the Department of General Surgery, Andhra Medical College and King George Hospital, Visakhapatnam, from September 2022 to January 2024. The study prospectively compared two predefined clinical groups at the time of operative management: 25 patients undergoing early laparoscopic cholecystectomy within 7 days of symptom onset and 25 undergoing interval laparoscopic cholecystectomy at least 6 weeks after resolution of the acute episode. All procedures began laparoscopically.
Results:
Mean age was 45.72 ± 13.88 years in the early group and 49.28 ± 11.47 years in the interval group. Conversion to open cholecystectomy occurred in 28.0% and 16.0%, respectively. Intraoperative difficulty occurred in 60.0% versus 36.0%. Transient bile leak (16.0% vs. 12.0%), superficial wound infection (20.0% vs. 8.0%), and atelectasis (24.0% vs. 16.0%) showed no statistically significant between-group differences. Mean hospital stay was 9.80 ± 6.87 versus 9.88 ± 6.75 days. Age correlated positively with hospital stay (r = 0.36).
Conclusion:
Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy was feasible in selected patients with uncomplicated acute cholecystitis. Although technical difficulty and conversion were numerically higher, short-term complication rates and hospital stay were not significantly different from interval surgery.
Recommendations:
Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be considered for eligible patients when appropriate surgical expertise, perioperative support, and safe bailout strategies are available. Larger multicenter studies should confirm comparative effectiveness and uncommon adverse outcomes.
References
1. Pisano M, Allievi N, Gurusamy K, Borzellino G, Cimbanassi S, Boerna D, et al. 2020 World Society of Emergency Surgery updated guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute calculus cholecystitis. World J Emerg Surg. 2020;15(1):61. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-020-00336-x
2. Yokoe M, Hata J, Takada T, Strasberg SM, Asbun HJ, Wakabayashi G, et al. Tokyo Guidelines 2018: diagnostic criteria and severity grading of acute cholecystitis (with videos). J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2018;25(1):41-54. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.515
3. Okamoto K, Suzuki K, Takada T, Strasberg SM, Asbun HJ, Endo I, et al. Tokyo Guidelines 2018: flowchart for the management of acute cholecystitis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2018;25(1):55-72. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.516
4. Wakabayashi G, Iwashita Y, Hibi T, Takada T, Strasberg SM, Asbun HJ, et al. Tokyo Guidelines 2018: surgical management of acute cholecystitis: safe steps in laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis (with videos). J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2018;25(1):73-86. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.517
5. Lo CM, Liu CL, Fan ST, Lai EC, Wong J. Prospective randomized study of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Ann Surg. 1998;227(4):461-467. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-199804000-00001
6. Lai PB, Kwong KH, Leung KL, Kwok SP, Chan AC, Chung SC, et al. Randomized trial of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Br J Surg. 1998;85(6):764-767. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00708.x
7. Johansson M, Thune A, Blomqvist A, Nelvin L, Lundell L. Management of acute cholecystitis in the laparoscopic era: results of a prospective, randomized clinical trial. J Gastrointest Surg. 2003;7(5):642-645. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1091-255X(03)00065-9
8. Kolla SB, Aggarwal S, Kumar A, Kumar R, Chumber S, Parshad R, et al. Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a prospective randomized trial. Surg Endosc. 2004;18(9):1323-1327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-003-9230-6
9. Shikata S, Noguchi Y, Fukui T. Early versus delayed cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surg Today. 2005;35(7):553-560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-005-2998-3
10. Siddiqui T, MacDonald A, Chong PS, Jenkins JT. Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Am J Surg. 2008;195(1):40-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.03.004
11. Gurusamy KS, Davidson C, Gluud C, Davidson BR. Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for people with acute cholecystitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(6): CD005440. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005440.pub3
12. Gutt CN, Encke J, Koninger J, Harnoss JC, Weigand K, Kipfmuller K, et al. Acute cholecystitis: early versus delayed cholecystectomy, a multicenter randomized trial (ACDC study, NCT00447304). Ann Surg. 2013;258(3):385-393. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182a1599b
13. de Mestral C, Rotstein OD, Laupacis A, Hoch JS, Zagorski B, Alali AS, et al. Comparative operative outcomes of early and delayed cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a population-based propensity score analysis. Ann Surg. 2014;259(1):10-15. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182a5cf36
14. Wu XD, Tian X, Liu MM, Wu L, Zhao S, Zhao L. Meta-analysis comparing early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Br J Surg. 2015;102(11):1302-1313. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9886
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Dr. Venkata Rama Krishna Reddy Avula, Dr. ADV Lavanya, Dr. A. Shivakumar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
