Morphology and Morphometry of the Vermiform Appendix in Kashmiri Population: A Cross-Sectional Contrast Computed Tomography (CT)-Based Study.

Javed Ahmad Khan; Baseerat Rashid Kaboo; Naseer Ahmad Khan; Reyhana Yousuf; Sajad Hamid; Sheikh Aakida Hussain

doi:10.51168/97jaef26

Autori

Javed Ahmad Khan Associate Professor, Department of Anatomy, Government Medical College, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India.
Baseerat Rashid Kaboo Associate Professor, Department of Radiodiagnosis, Government Medical College, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India.
Naseer Ahmad Khan Associate Professor, Department of Radiodiagnosis, Government Medical College, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India.
Reyhana Yousuf Senior Resident, Department of Anatomy, Kashmir Medical College, Jammu and Kashmir, India.
Sajad Hamid Associate Professor, Department of Anatomy, SKIMS Medical College, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India.
Sheikh Aakida Hussain Post Graduate Scholar, Department of Anatomy, Government Medical College, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51168/97jaef26

Cuvinte cheie:

Appendix, Normal Anatomy, Computed Tomography, Population Anatomy, Appendicitis Diagnosis, Surgical Reference

Rezumat

Background

Diagnosis of acute appendicitis on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) relies heavily on a 6 mm appendiceal diameter threshold derived largely from Western populations. Population-specific anatomical reference data for Kashmiri adults are lacking, raising the possibility that this threshold may not translate accurately to this population.

Methods

A cross-sectional, prospective observational study was conducted in the Department of Radiodiagnosis, Government Medical College, Srinagar, over one month (1–31 March 2024). Using consecutive sampling, 100 contrast-enhanced abdominal CT scans of asymptomatic adults (≥18 years) imaged for indications unrelated to the appendix were included; individuals with prior appendicitis, right iliac fossa surgery, or CT evidence of appendiceal pathology were excluded. Appendiceal position, length, and width at the base, midpoint, and tip were measured on PACS workstations, with 20% re-measured independently for reliability. Data were analysed in SPSS version 26.0 using descriptive statistics.

Results

Participants had a mean age of 34.6 ± 12.3 years (range 18–65 years) with a near-equal male-to-female ratio (58:42). The appendix was most frequently retrocecal (33%), followed by preileal (22%), postileal (19%), subcecal (13%), paracecal (8%), and pelvic (5%) positions. Mean appendiceal length was 5.4 ± 0.6 cm (range 4.2–6.6 cm). Mean width was 7.2 ± 0.3 mm at the base (range 6.7–7.8 mm), tapering to 6.5 ± 0.5 mm at the midpoint and 6.0 ± 0.8 mm at the tip. A basal width exceeding the conventional 6 mm threshold was observed in 41% of asymptomatic individuals.

Conclusion

Kashmiri adults may possess a naturally larger appendiceal caliber than currently accepted international norms, and rigid application of the 6 mm threshold risks overdiagnosis of appendicitis in this population.

Recommendation

Population-specific reference ranges are recommended for appendiceal diameter, with diagnostic emphasis placed on secondary CT signs of inflammation rather than diameter alone, particularly in borderline cases.

Biografii autori

Javed Ahmad Khan, Associate Professor, Department of Anatomy, Government Medical College, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India.

is an Associate Professor in the Department of Anatomy, Government Medical College, Srinagar, with a research interest in clinical and radiological anatomy.
Baseerat Rashid Kaboo, Associate Professor, Department of Radiodiagnosis, Government Medical College, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India.

is a Senior Resident in the Department of Anatomy, Government Medical College Baramulla, with an interest in gross and applied anatomy.
Naseer Ahmad Khan, Associate Professor, Department of Radiodiagnosis, Government Medical College, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India.

is an Associate Professor in the Department of Radiodiagnosis, Government Medical College, Srinagar, specialising in abdominal and cross-sectional imaging.
Reyhana Yousuf, Senior Resident, Department of Anatomy, Kashmir Medical College, Jammu and Kashmir, India.

is a Senior Resident in the Department of Anatomy, Kashmir Medical College, with research interests in morphometric and imaging-based anatomical studies.
Sajad Hamid, Associate Professor, Department of Anatomy, SKIMS Medical College, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India.

is an Associate Professor in the Department of Anatomy, Skims Medical College, Srinagar, with an interest in applied and surgical anatomy.
Sheikh Aakida Hussain, Post Graduate Scholar, Department of Anatomy, Government Medical College, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India.

is a Postgraduate Scholar in the Department of Anatomy, Government Medical College, Srinagar, involved in anatomical and imaging-based research.

Referințe

1. Kooij A, Sahami S, Meijer SL, Buskens CJ, te Velde AA. The immunology of the vermiform appendix: a review of the literature. Clin Exp Immunol. 2016;186(1):1-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/cei.12821

2. Petroianu A. Diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Int J Surg. 2012;10(3):115-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2012.02.006

3. Krzyzak M, Mulrooney SM. Acute appendicitis review: background, epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Cureus. 2020;12(6):e8562. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.8562

4. Puylaert JB. Acute appendicitis: US evaluation using graded compression. Radiology. 1986;158(2):355-360. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.158.2.2934762

5. Echevarria S, Rauf F, Hussain N, Zaka H, Farwa UE, Ahsan N, et al. Typical and atypical presentations of appendicitis and their implications for diagnosis and treatment: a literature review. Cureus. 2023;15(4):e37024. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.37024

6. Parmar PD, Dave J, Vekariya M, et al. Study of variations in position of appendix in 100 operated cases of appendicitis. Int J Health Sci Res. 2017;7(5):42-46.

7. Kachare M, Patil AD, Gamanagatti SA, Kulkarni SB. Computed tomography scan correlation of position of appendix with present literature. J Gastrointest Abdom Radiol. 2025;08(01):014-018. doi:10.1055/s-0044-1788261. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1788261

8. Singh N, Agrawal P, Singh DK, Agrawal GR. Computed tomography evaluation of variations in positions and measurements of appendix in patients with non-appendicular symptoms: time to revise the diagnostic criteria for appendicitis. Pol J Radiol. 2023;88:407-414. https://doi.org/10.5114/pjr.2023.131074

9. Bakhei MA, Warille AA. Anomalies of the vermiform appendix and prevalence of acute appendicitis in Khartoum. East Afr Med J. 1999;76(6):338-340.

10. Clegg-Lamptey JN, Armah H, Naaeder SB, Adu-Aryee NA. Position and susceptibility to inflammation of vermiform appendix in Accra, Ghana. East Afr Med J. 2008;83(12):670-678. https://doi.org/10.4314/eamj.v83i12.9498

11. Ghorbani A, Forouzesh M, Kazemifar AM. Variation in anatomical position of vermiform appendix among Iranian population: an old issue which has not lost its importance. Anat Res Int. 2014;2014:313575. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/313575

12. Elgabsi M, Malkiely G, Weiss T, Tchernin N, Kessel B, Zilbermints V. Clinical impact of appendiceal morphology on surgical outcomes and readmissions: does size matter? J Clin Med. 2025;14(16):5635. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14165635

13. Kessler N, Cyteval C, Gallix B, et al. Appendicitis: evaluation of sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of US, Doppler US, and laboratory findings. Radiology. 2004;230(2):472-478. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2302021520

14. Trout AT, Sanchez R, Ladino-Torres MF. A critical evaluation of US for the diagnosis of pediatric acute appendicitis in a real-life setting. Pediatr Radiol. 2012;42(7):813-823. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-012-2358-6

15. Wakeley CP. The position of the vermiform appendix as ascertained by an analysis of 10,000 cases. J Anat. 1933;67(Pt 2):277-283.

16. Pooler BD, Lawrence EM, Pickhardt PJ. Alternative diagnoses to suspected appendicitis at CT. Radiographics. 2012;32(3):789-810. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.12120614

17. Hanson AL, Crosby RD, Basson MD. Patient preferences for surgery or antibiotics for the treatment of acute appendicitis. JAMA Surg. 2018;153(5):471-478. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2017.5310

18. Willekens I, Peeters E, De Maeseneer M, de Mey J. The normal appendix on CT: does size matter? PLoS One. 2014;9(5):e96476. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096476

19. Raschka S, Raschka C. Zur Beziehung zwischen Körperbau und Appendixlänge [On the relationship between body dimensions and appendix length]. Anthropol Anz. 2008;66(1):67-72. German. https://doi.org/10.1127/aa/66/2008/67

20. El-Busaidy H, Sinkeet S, Ogeng'o J. Variations in the position and length of the vermiform appendix in a black Kenyan population. ISRN Anat. 2014;2014:871048. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/871048

21. Pickhardt PJ, Suhonen J, Lawrence EM, et al. Appendiceal length as an independent risk factor for acute appendicitis. Eur Radiol. 2013;23(12):3311-331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-013-2948-1

22. Alzaraa A, Chaudhry S. An unusually long appendix in a child: a case report. Cases J. 2009;2:7398. https://doi.org/10.4076/1757-1626-2-7398

23. Laraqui H, Lamgari M, Essarghini M, Zentar A. An unusual presentation of appendicitis: a 23 cm long appendix in Morocco. Pan Afr Med J. 2019;32:72.