Experimental Evaluation of the Anticonvulsant Effect of Clove Oil Compared with Sodium Valproate in the Maximal Electroshock Model in Mice.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51168/tdaeh637Keywords:
Clove oil, eugenol, anticonvulsant, sodium valproate, maximal electroshock, mice, hind-limb tonic extensionAbstract
Background
Epilepsy remains a major neurological disorder, and a substantial proportion of patients continue to experience seizures despite available antiseizure therapy. Clove essential oil contains eugenol and other bioactive constituents that may influence neuronal excitability, supporting investigation of its potential anticonvulsant activity.
Objective
To evaluate the anticonvulsant activity of clove oil in mice and compare its effects with sodium valproate using the maximal electroshock (MES) model.
Methods
This experimental comparative study included 18 three-month-old male albino mice weighing approximately 30 g. Animals were allocated into three groups of six and received normal saline 5 mL/kg, sodium valproate 200 mg/kg, or clove oil 0.1 mL/kg intraperitoneally 30 minutes before MES. Electroshock was delivered through transauricular electrodes at 12 mA and 50 Hz for 0.2 seconds. Seizure phases, hind-limb tonic extension (HLTE), abolition of HLTE, and percentage protection were assessed.
Results
Significant differences were observed during the tonic extension phase for control versus sodium valproate (P=.0001), control versus clove oil (P=.0001), and sodium valproate versus clove oil (P=.0023). Stupor duration also differed significantly across all pairwise comparisons (P=.046, P=.0006, and P=.0048, respectively). HLTE was abolished in 0/6 control mice, 3/6 sodium-valproate mice, and 4/6 clove-oil mice, corresponding to 0%, 50.0%, and 66.7% protection, respectively. Baseline HLTE measures were comparable among groups (P=.91), whereas post-treatment values differed significantly (P=.03), with values of 2.01±1.29, 2.16±1.06, and 0.51±0.50 in the control, sodium-valproate, and clove-oil groups, respectively.
Conclusion
Clove oil demonstrated anticonvulsant activity in the MES model, with greater numerical protection against HLTE than sodium valproate. However, the small sample size and absence of inferential comparison of protection proportions preclude conclusions regarding therapeutic superiority.
Recommendations
Further dose-response, toxicity, pharmacokinetic, and mechanistic studies using larger samples and additional seizure models are warranted before clinical translation.
References
1. Stafstrom CE, Carmant L. Seizures and epilepsy: an overview for neuroscientists. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2015;5(6):a022426.
https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a022426
2. Mesraoua B, Brigo F, Lattanzi S, Abou-Khalil B, Al Hail H, Asadi-Pooya AA. Drug-resistant epilepsy: Definition, pathophysiology, and management. J Neurol Sci. 2023;452:120766.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2023.120766
3. Haro-Gonz�lez JN, Castillo-Herrera GA, Mart�nez-Vel�zquez M, Espinosa-Andrews H. Clove essential oil (Syzygium aromaticum L. Myrtaceae): extraction, chemical composition, food applications, and essential bioactivity for human health. Molecules. 2021;26(21):6387.
https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26216387
4. Cort�s-Rojas DF, de Souza CRF, Oliveira WP. Clove (Syzygium aromaticum): a precious spice. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed. 2014;4(2):90-96.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S2221-1691(14)60215-X
5. Taleuzzaman M, Jain P, Verma R, Iqbal Z, Mirza MA. Eugenol as a potential drug candidate: a review. Curr Top Med Chem. 2021;21(20):1804-1815.
https://doi.org/10.2174/1568026621666210701141433
6. Pourgholami MH, Kamalinejad M, Javadi M, Majzoob S, Sayyah M. Evaluation of the anticonvulsant activity of the essential oil of Eugenia caryophyllata in male mice. J Ethnopharmacol. 1999;64(2):167-171.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-8741(98)00121-4
7. Hosseini M, Jafarianheris T, Seddighi N, Parvaneh M, Ghorbani A, Sadeghnia HR, et al. Effects of different extracts of Eugenia caryophyllata on pentylenetetrazole-induced seizures in mice. Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Xue Bao. 2012;10(12):1476-1481.
https://doi.org/10.3736/jcim20121222
8. Huang CW, Chow JC, Tsai JJ, Wu SN. Characterizing the effects of eugenol on neuronal ionic currents and hyperexcitability. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2012;221(4):575-587
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-011-2603-y
9. Park CK, Li HY, Yeon KY, Jung SJ, Choi SY, Lee SJ, et al. Eugenol inhibits sodium currents in dental afferent neurons. J Dent Res. 2006;85(10):900-904.
https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910608501005
10. 1Castel-Branco MM, Alves GL, Figueiredo IV, Falc�o AC, Caramona MM. The maximal electroshock seizure (MES) model in the preclinical assessment of potential new antiepileptic drugs. Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol. 2009;31(2):101-106.
https://doi.org/10.1358/mf.2009.31.2.1338414
11. Giardina WJ, Gasior M. Acute seizure tests in epilepsy research: electroshock- and chemical-induced convulsions in the mouse. Curr Protoc Pharmacol. 2009;Chapter 5:Unit 5.22.
https://doi.org/10.1002/0471141755.ph0522s45
12. L�scher W. Critical review of current animal models of seizures and epilepsy used in the discovery and development of new antiepileptic drugs. Seizure. 2011;20(5):359-368.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seizure.2011.01.003
13. L�scher W. Animal models of seizures and epilepsy: past, present, and future role for the discovery of antiseizure drugs. Neurochem Res. 2017;42(7):1873-1888.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11064-017-2222-z
14. Romoli M, Mazzocchetti P, D'Alonzo R, Siliquini S, Rinaldi VE, Verrotti A, et al. Valproic acid and epilepsy: from molecular mechanisms to clinical evidences. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2019;17(10):926-946. d
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Dr. Kandula Chaitanya, Dr. Sajja Suguna, Dr. Bhuvaneshwari .G, Dr. Edavaluru Shravya

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.














