Investment in Indian indigenous healing systems-based self-mastery and wellness programmes in organizations for efficient work culture, self-management, and wellness: A prospective longitudinal single-cohort observational study.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51168/9h036d06Keywords:
Indian Indigenous Healing Systems, self-mastery, workplace wellness, wellness investment, self-management, workplace functioning, perceived wellbeing, WHO-5, embedded ethnocognitive practices, Indian ethnomedicine, culturally grounded wellness, workplace self-regulationAbstract
Background:
Workplace wellness is increasingly framed within sustainable human resource management, extending beyond symptom reduction to self-management, well-being, work-related functioning, and perceived value. However, culturally grounded approaches to workplace self-mastery and perceived return from Indian Indigenous Healing Systems (IIHS) remain underexplored.
Aim:
To explore and characterize perceived wellness investment associated with participation in an Indian Indigenous Healing Systems-based Self-Mastery and Wellness Programme (IIHS-SMWP) among working professionals, with reference to self-mastery, personal wellbeing, workplace functioning and efficiency, and subjective mental wellbeing over 12 months.
Methods:
An exploratory sequential mixed-methods approach included an initial qualitative phase followed by a prospective longitudinal single-cohort observational study. Seventy working professionals from diverse sectors in Bhubaneswar, Odisha, participated in IIHS-SMWP and were followed for 12 months. Participants attended 24 programme sessions based on a common framework with participant-specific sequencing. Outcomes were assessed using a face- and construct-validated study-specific questionnaire with high internal consistency (Cronbach’s α=0.90) and the WHO-5 Well-Being Index. Within-participant comparisons used paired t-tests and repeated-measures ANOVA.
Results:
Significant longitudinal differences were observed across assessed domains. Self-mastery, awareness of and engagement with IIHS, personal well-being-return outcomes, workplace-related outcomes, and WHO-5 raw and percentage scores all also improved significantly over follow-up (p≤0.002), with partial η² ranging from 0.044 to 0.881.
Conclusion:
The findings showed longitudinal changes in self-mastery, well-being, workplace functioning, IIHS engagement, and mental well-being among IIHS-SMWP professionals. They support conceptualising wellness investment as a multidimensional construct spanning personal, functional, organisational, and cultural domains. However, observational design, lack of a control group, convenience sampling, and self-reported outcomes preclude causal attribution, therapeutic efficacy, and conclusions about productivity or financial return.
Recommendation:
Further controlled, multicentre, adequately powered studies incorporating objective measures of workplace functioning, productivity, healthcare utilisation, absenteeism, and programme-related costs are recommended to determine whether observed longitudinal changes translate into measurable organisational and economic benefits.
References
1. Peña I, Andrade SM, Muñoz RM, Barba-Sánchez V. Wellness programs, perceived organizational support, and their influence on organizational performance: an analysis within the framework of sustainable human resource management. SAGE Open. 2024;14(1):1-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241229358
2. Virtanen M, Lallukka T, Elovainio M, Steptoe A, Kivimäki M. Effectiveness of workplace interventions for health promotion. Lancet Public Health. 2025;10(6):e512-e530. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(25)00095-7
3. Henstock L, Johnson R, Kinghorn P, Beach D, Al-Janabi H. Why and how do workplaces invest in mental health and wellbeing? A systematic review and process tracing study. SocSci Med. 2025;366:117633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117633
4. Clarkson K, Maidment DW, Yarker J, Munir F. Informing a workplace self-management intervention for employees with long-term health conditions and disabilities: a mixed-methods study. J Occup Rehabil. 2026.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-026-10374-y
5. Ilavarasu J. Yoga for workplace wellbeing: insights from Indian thought. IIMT J Manag. 2025;2(2):148-153.
https://doi.org/10.1108/IIMTJM-10-2025-087
6. Maidment DW, Clarkson K, Shiel EV, Nielsen K, Yarker J, Munir F. A rapid systematic review assessing the effectiveness of interventions to promote self-management in workers with long-term health conditions and disabilities. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024;21(12):1714. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21121714
7. Radheshyam A, Ramani VK, Thupalle S, Darukaradhya TB, Naik R. Effectiveness of meditation on wellness management among corporate employees in India: an interventional study. Health Sci Rep. 2024;7:e1950. https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.1950
8. Michaelsen MM, Graser J, Onescheit M, Tuma MP, Werdecker L, Pieper D, et al. Mindfulness-based and mindfulness-informed interventions at the workplace: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis of RCTs. Mindfulness. 2023.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-023-02130-7
9. Della Valle E, Palermi S, Aloe I, Marcantonio R, Spera R, Montagnani S, et al. Effectiveness of workplace yoga interventions to reduce perceived stress in employees: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J FunctMorpholKinesiol. 2020;5(2):33.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk5020033
10. Habeeb S. Relation between organisational citizenship behavior, workplace spirituality and job performance in BFSI sector in India. ProblPerspectManag. 2019;17(1):176-188. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.17(1).2019.16
11. Pradhan RK, Jena LK, Bhattacharya P. Impact of psychological capital on organizational citizenship behavior: moderating role of emotional intelligence. Cogent Bus Manag. 2016;3(1):1194174. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2016.1194174
12. Pradhan RK, Jena LK, Soto CM. Workplace spirituality in Indian organisations: construction of a reliable and valid measurement scale. Bus Theory Pract. 2017;18(1):43-53. https://doi.org/10.3846/btp.2017.005
13. Sharma SK. Workplace spirituality: reliability and factorial validity in Indian context. Int J Res Methodol. 2025;3(4):1-5.
14. Showers CJ, Ditzfeld CP, Zeigler-Hill V. Self-concept structure and the quality of self-knowledge. J Pers. 2015;83(5):535-551. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12130
15. Heatherton TF. Neuroscience of self and self-regulation. Annu Rev Psychol. 2011;62:363-390.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.121208.131616
16. Bhoir M, Sinha V. Employee well-being human resource practices: a systematic literature review and directions for future research. Future Bus J. 2024;10:95. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-024-00382-w
17. Bentley TGK, D'Andrea-Penna G, Rakic M, Arce N, LaFaille M, Berman R, et al. Breathing practices for stress and anxiety reduction: conceptual framework of implementation guidelines based on a systematic review of the published literature. Brain Sci. 2023;13(12):1612. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13121612
18. Gordon EM, Chauvin RJ, Van AN, Rajesh A, Nielsen A, Newbold DJ, et al. A somato-cognitive action network alternates with effector regions in motor cortex. Nature. 2023;617:351-359. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-05964-2
19. Vagedes J, Szőke H, Al Islam MO, Sobh M, Kuderer S, Khazan I, et al. Mobile heart rate variability biofeedback for work-related stress in employees and the influence of instruction format: digital or live, on training outcome: a non-randomized controlled trial. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2025;50:79-93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-024-09671-0
20. Pratyush M, Bahubalendra SM, Soumya S. A PRISMA-aligned review-based opinion article. Int J Curr Pharm Rev Res. 2025;17(8):200-216.
21. Tripathy S, Panda PC, Mishra P, Sahoo S, Parida KC. Social determinants of health, cultural distress, and transgenerational trauma in Indian context: a hermeneutic review of embodied health, somato-cognitive pathways, and role of Indic lineage-based healing systems. Int J Med. 2026;8(5):562-582.
22. ChinganThottathil S, Nandakumar MK. Integrating hedonic and eudaimonic perspectives of well-being: a conceptual model for sustaining employee well-being in the remote work context. Hum Resour Dev Rev. 2025;24(2):157-198.
https://doi.org/10.1177/15344843241305650
23. Jada U, Swain D, John T, Jena LK. Do leadership style and HRM practices promote employee well-being post-onset of the new normal? A mixed-method approach. South Asian J Hum Resour Manag. 2025;12(1):34-60.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Prakash Chandra Panda, Soumya Tripathy, Pratyush Mishra, Suvendu Kumar Panda, Sanjeeta Nayak, Kartika Chandra Parida

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.














