“Prevalence and determinants of anaemia among pregnant women attending RHTC and UHTC of a tertiary medical centre of South Bihar: a facility-based cross-sectional analytical study”

Authors

  • Dr. Suman Kumar Bharti Assistant Professor, Department of Community Medicine, Mahabodhi Medical College, Gaya Ji, Bihar
  • Dr. Akhilesh Kumar Dubey Assistant Professor, Department of Community Medicine, Mahabodhi Medical College, Gaya Ji, Bihar
  • Dr. (Prof) Sazid Hussain Professor & Head, Department of Community Medicine, Madhubani Medical College, Madhubani, Bihar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51168/0qpkh333

Keywords:

determinants, antenatal care, iron-folic acid, urban health facility, rural health facility, pregnancy, Anaemia

Abstract

Background:

Anaemia during pregnancy remains a major public-health problem in India and is associated with maternal morbidity, poor foetal growth, preterm birth and low birth weight. Despite iron-folic acid supplementation and antenatal screening, rural–urban and socioeconomic disparities persist.

Aim:

To determine the prevalence of anaemia and identify its sociodemographic, nutritional and obstetric determinants among pregnant women attending rural and urban health facilities.

Methods:

A facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted among 400 pregnant women, comprising 200 attending a rural and 200 an urban health facility of Mahabodhi Medical College, Gayaji, Bihar. Sociodemographic, obstetric, dietary, iron-folic acid (IFA) supplementation, and antenatal-care information were collected using a pretested questionnaire. Haemoglobin was estimated using the Acid-Haematin method. Anaemia was classified according to WHO criteria. Associations were assessed using the chi-square test, with p<0.05 considered statistically significant.

Results:

Anaemia was present in 232/400 (58.0%) women. Prevalence was higher among rural than urban women (64.0% vs. 52.0%; χ²=5.43, p=0.020). Anaemia was significantly associated with lower educational attainment (68.2% vs. 45.6%; p<0.001), inadequate IFA intake (81.0% vs. 35.0%; p<0.001), poor dietary diversity (83.5% vs. 32.5%; p<0.001), and trimester (40.0%, 61.5% and 60.0% in the first, second and third trimesters, respectively; p=0.021). Mild anaemia was most common (28.0%), followed by moderate (26.0%) and severe anaemia (4.0%).

Conclusion:

Anaemia remains highly prevalent, particularly among rural pregnant women. Lower education, inadequate IFA intake, poor dietary diversity, and later gestation were significantly associated with anaemia.

Recommendation:

Strengthen early ANC registration, IFA adherence monitoring, dietary counselling, and targeted anaemia-prevention interventions in rural populations.

Author Biographies

  • Dr. Suman Kumar Bharti, Assistant Professor, Department of Community Medicine, Mahabodhi Medical College, Gaya Ji, Bihar

    is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Community Medicine at Mahabodhi Medical College, Gayaji, Bihar.

  • Dr. Akhilesh Kumar Dubey, Assistant Professor, Department of Community Medicine, Mahabodhi Medical College, Gaya Ji, Bihar

    is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Community Medicine at Mahabodhi Medical College, Gayaji, Bihar.

  • Dr. (Prof) Sazid Hussain, Professor & Head, Department of Community Medicine, Madhubani Medical College, Madhubani, Bihar

    is Professor and Head of the Department of Community Medicine at Madhubani Medical College, Madhubani, Bihar.

References

haemoglobin cutoffs to define anaemia in individuals and populations. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2024.

2. World Health Organization. Anaemia. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2024.

3. Kuppusamy P, Prusty RK, Khan SA. Assessing the prevalence and predictors of anemia among pregnant women in India: findings from the India National Family Health Survey 2019-2021. Curr Med Res Opin. 2024;40(1):51-58. https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2023.2276851

4. Kumar D, Kumar A, Maiti S, Lhungdim H. Spatial heterogeneity and socioeconomic inequalities in anaemia among Indian women. Anemia. 2026;2026:1265576. https://doi.org/10.1155/anem/1265576

5. Puri DC, Rasal MM, Giri PA. A cross-sectional study to assess anemia & its determinants among pregnant women in a rural area of Maharashtra. Indian J Community Health. 2024;36(1):7-15. https://doi.org/10.47203/IJCH.2024.v36i01.019

6. Agarwal A, Bakshi H, Kadri AM, Joshi KJ, Vala A, Dholariya S, et al. Assessing anemia burden and multifactorial contributors among pregnant women in Gujarat: a cross-sectional study integrating biochemical, nutritional, and geographic disparities. Front Glob Womens Health. 2025;6:1717148-54. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgwh.2025.1717148

7. Gardner WM, Razo C, McHugh TA, et al. Prevalence, years lived with disability, and trends in anaemia burden by severity and cause, 1990-2021: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet Haematol. 2023;10(9):e713-e734.

8. Ghosh K, Chakraborty AS, Haloi B, Zakir S. Spatial clustering of malnutrition and anemia among reproductive women and its associated risk factors in India: evidence from National Family Health Survey-5. Food Nutr Bull. 2024;45(1):3-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/03795721241234086

Downloads

Published

2026-09-16

Issue

Section

Section of Community and Public Health Research

How to Cite

Kumar Bharti, S., Akhilesh Dubey, K., & Dr. Prof. Sazid Hussain. (2026). “Prevalence and determinants of anaemia among pregnant women attending RHTC and UHTC of a tertiary medical centre of South Bihar: a facility-based cross-sectional analytical study”. Student’s Journal of Health Research Africa, 7(3), 10. https://doi.org/10.51168/0qpkh333