Functional and Radiological Outcomes in Adults with Proximal Tibia Fractures Treated with Intramedullary Interlocking Nail by Suprapatellar Technique: A Prospective Observational Study.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51168/g7fk4p66Keywords:
Proximal tibial fracture, intramedullary nailing, suprapatellar approach, semi-extended position, Knee Society Score, fracture unionAbstract
Background:To evaluate the functional and radiological outcomes of adults with selected proximal tibial fractures treated with intramedullary interlocking nailing using the suprapatellar technique.
Methods:A prospective observational study was conducted in the Department of Orthopaedics at R.N.T. Medical College and Maharana Bhupal Government Hospital, Udaipur, from April 2024 to March 2025. Twenty-four adults aged 18–50 years with closed proximal tibial fractures classified as AO/OTA 41A2, 41A3, or 41B1 were included. All patients underwent intramedullary interlocking nailing through a suprapatellar approach with the knee maintained in a semi-extended position. Functional and radiological outcomes were assessed using the Knee Society Score, clinical examination, and serial radiographs.
Results:The study included 14 males (58.3%) and 10 females (41.7%), with a mean age of 33.87 years. Road traffic accidents accounted for 20 cases (83.3%), and AO/OTA 41A2 was the most common fracture pattern, affecting 14 patients (58.3%). The mean operative time was 45.3 minutes, the mean hospital stay was 8.2 days, and the mean fracture union time was 14.5 weeks. At 3 months, 7 patients (29.1%) had excellent, 9 (37.5%) good, 5 (20.8%) fair, and 3 (12.5%) poor functional outcomes. At 6 months, 20 patients (83.3%) had excellent, 2 (8.3%) good, 1 (4.2%) fair, and 1 (4.2%) poor outcomes. Two patients developed postoperative knee stiffness, and one developed proximal screw loosening. No loss of reduction or progressive displacement was reported.
Conclusion:Suprapatellar intramedullary interlocking nailing in the semi-extended position was associated with satisfactory functional and radiological outcomes in this small series of selected proximal tibial fractures.
Recommendation:Larger multicentre comparative studies with standardized radiological measurements and longer follow-up are recommended to further evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the suprapatellar technique.
References
. Bono CM, Levine RG, Rao JP, et al. Nonarticular proximal tibia fractures: treatment options and decision making. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2001;9:176-186. https://doi.org/10.5435/00124635-200105000-00004
2. DeCoster TA, Nepola JV, el-Khoury GY. Cast brace treatment of proximal tibia fractures: a 10-year follow-up study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;231:196-204. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-198806000-00026
3. Jensen DB, Rude C, Duus B, Bjerg-Nielsen A. Tibial plateau fractures: a comparison of conservative and surgical treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990;72(1):49-52. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.72B1.2298794
4. Gerber A, Ganz R. Combined internal and external osteosynthesis: a biological approach to the treatment of complex fractures of the proximal tibia. Injury. 1998;29 Suppl 3:C22-C28. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-1383(98)95005-7
5. Lang GJ, Cohen BE, Bosse MJ, et al. Proximal third tibial shaft fractures: should they be nailed? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995;315:64-74. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199506000-00008
6. Stinner DJ, Mir H. Techniques for intramedullary nailing of proximal tibia fractures. Orthop Clin North Am. 2014;45(1):33-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocl.2013.09.001
7. Tornetta P 3rd, Collins E. Semiextended position of intramedullary nailing of the proximal tibia. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;328:185-189. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199607000-00029
8. Sanders RW, DiPasquale TG, Jordan CJ, Arrington JA, Sagi HC. Semiextended intramedullary nailing of proximal tibia fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2012;26(7):435-441.
9. Jakma T, Reynders-Frederix PE, Rajmohan R. Insertion of intramedullary nails from the suprapatellar pouch for proximal tibial shaft fractures: a technical note. Acta Orthop Belg. 2011;77(6):834.
10. Zelle BA, Boni G, Hak DJ, Stahel PF. Advances in intramedullary nailing: suprapatellar nailing of tibial shaft fractures in the semi-extended position. Orthopedics. 2015;38(12):751-755.
https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20151119-06
11. Beltran MJ, Collinge CA, Patzkowski JS, Masini BD, Blease RE, Hsu JR. Intra-articular risks of suprapatellar nailing. Am J Orthop. 2012;41(12):546-550.
12. Zamora R, Wright C, Short A, Seligson D. Comparison between suprapatellar and parapatellar approaches for intramedullary nailing of the tibia: cadaveric study. Injury. 2016;47(10):2087-2090.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2016.07.024
13. Krivohlavek M, Sram J, Pazour J, Kloub M. Suprapatellar nailing of tibial fractures: evaluation of clinical and radiological results. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2018;85(2):113-119. https://doi.org/10.55095/achot2018/018
14. Kulkarni MS, Tummala M, Aroor MN, Vijayan S, Rao SK. Suprapatellar nailing in proximal third tibial fractures: clinicoradiological outcome. Injury. 2020;51(8):1879-1886. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2020.05.008.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2020.05.008
15. Yang L, Sun Y, Li G. Comparison of suprapatellar and infrapatellar intramedullary nailing for tibial shaft fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2018;13:146.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-018-0846-6
16. Ponugoti N, Rudran B, Selim A, Nahas S, Magill H. Infrapatellar versus suprapatellar approach for intramedullary nailing of the tibia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2021;16:1-9.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02249-0
17. Elsoe R, Larsen P, Nielsen NP, Swenne J, Rasmussen S, Ostgaard SE. Population-based epidemiology of tibial fractures. Injury. 2015;46(4):746-750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2014.12.027
18. Hak DJ. Intramedullary nailing of proximal third tibial fractures: techniques to improve reduction. Orthopedics. 2011;34:532-535. https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20110526-19
19. Hiesterman TG, Shafiq BX, Cole PA. Intramedullary nailing of extra-articular proximal tibia fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2011;19:690-700. https://doi.org/10.5435/00124635-201111000-0000
20. Fu B. Locked META intramedullary nailing fixation for tibial fractures via a suprapatellar approach. Indian J Orthop. 2016;50(3):283-289. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.181795
21. Rothberg DL, Daubs GM, Horwitz DS, Kubiak EN. One-year postoperative knee pain in patients with semi-extended tibial nailing versus control group. Orthopedics. 2013;36(5):e548-e553. https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20130426-14
22. Ryan SP, Steen B, Tornetta P, 3rd. Semi-extended nailing of metaphyseal tibia fractures: alignment and incidence of postoperative knee pain. J Orthop Trauma. 2014;28(5):263-269. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000000083
23. Gaines RJ, Rockwood J, Garland J, Ellingson C, Demaio M. Comparison of insertional trauma between suprapatellar and infrapatellar portals for tibial nailing. Orthopedics. 2013;36(9):e1155-e1158. https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20130821-1
24. Hessmann MH, Buhl M, Finkemeier C, Khoury A, Mosheiff R, Blauth M. Suprapatellar nailing of fractures of the tibia. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2020;32(5):440-454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00064-020-00649-9
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Dr. Chandraveer Singh Rao, Dr. Vikas Meena, Dr. Naresh Saini, Dr. M.P Jain, Dr. Anurag Talesara, Dr. Anamendra Sharma, Dr. Jyoti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
