Occupational risks among healthcare professionals in the dressing care unit of the Lagune University Hospital Center for Mother and Child (CHU-MEL), Cotonou, Benin: an exploratory descriptive qualitative study.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51168/0441xc73Keywords:
Occupational risks, Healthcare workers, Dressing care unit, Occupational health, Hospital safety, Lagune University Hospital Center for Mother and Child, Cotonou, Benin, Qualitative studyAbstract
Background:
Healthcare workers are exposed to biological, chemical, physical, ergonomic, mechanical, and psychosocial hazards. This study analyzed occupational risks among healthcare workers in the dressing care unit of the Lagune University Hospital Center for Mother and Child (CHU-MEL) in Cotonou, Benin.
Methods:
An exploratory descriptive qualitative study was conducted among five healthcare workers assigned to the dressing care unit, comprising three state-registered nurses and two nursing assistants. Data were collected between January 25 and February 25, 2025, through five individual semi-structured interviews, each lasting approximately 45 minutes, and five non-participant direct observation sessions, each lasting approximately 10 minutes. The interview guide was pretested in a healthcare facility in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Results:
Six categories of occupational risks were identified: biological, chemical, physicochemical, ergonomic, mechanical, and psychosocial risks. Biological risks included exposure to blood and other biological fluids, inconsistent application of standard precautions, handling of healthcare waste, and incomplete hepatitis B vaccination coverage. Chemical risks involved the handling and storage of disinfectants and bleach. Ergonomic risks included awkward postures, prolonged standing, and inadequate furniture. Psychosocial risks were associated with workload, staffing constraints, fatigue, and occupational stress. Biological and psychosocial risks had the highest criticality scores (12 each), followed by ergonomic risks (8), chemical and mechanical risks (6 each), and physicochemical risks (3).
Conclusion:
Healthcare workers in the dressing care unit of CHU-MEL are exposed to multiple occupational risks, with biological and psychosocial risks representing the highest priorities in the context of this study.
Recommendation:
Occupational health and safety measures should prioritize the consistent application of standard precautions, continuous access to appropriate personal protective equipment, hepatitis B vaccination, proper healthcare waste management, safe handling of chemical products, improved workplace ergonomics, adequate staffing and workload management, as well as the prevention of occupational stress and fatigue.
References
1. Auta, A., Adewuyi, E. O., Tor-Anyiin, A., Aziz, D., Ogbole, E., Ogbonna, B. O., & Adeloye, D. (2017). Health-care workers' occupational exposures to body fluids in 21 countries in Africa: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 95(12), 831-841. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.17.195735
2. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781036232078.n9
3. International Organization for Standardization. (2018). ISO 31000:2018 Risk management-Guidelines. ISO.
4. Johnson, J. L., Adkins, D., & Chauvin, S. (2020). A review of the quality criteria for qualitative research in health sciences. Medical Science Educator. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe7120
5. Korstjens, I., & Moser, A. (2018). Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4: Trustworthiness and publishing. European Journal of General Practice, 24(1), 120-124. https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2017.1375092
6. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8
7. Moser, A., & Korstjens, I. (2018). Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 3: Sampling, data collection and analysis. European Journal of General Practice, 24(1), 9-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2017.1375091
8. Ngatu, N. R., Kanbara, K., Wansu-Mapong, C., Tonduangu, D. K., Leon-Kabamba, N., Nsadi-Fwene, B., et al. (2026). Occupational infection prevention among nurses and laboratory technicians amidst multiple health emergencies in an outbreak-prone country, D.R. Congo. Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease, 11(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed11010014
9. Ngatu, N. R., Kayembe, K. P., Shabani, A. M., & others. (2012). Practice of universal precautions and risk of occupational blood-borne viral infection among Congolese health care workers. American Journal of Infection Control, 40(1), 68-70.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2011.01.021
10. World Health Organization. (2024a). Health-care waste. World Health Organization.
11. World Health Organization. (2026). Occupational hazards in the health sector. World Health Organization.
12. World Health Organization & International Labour Organization. (2022a). Caring for those who care: Guide for the development and implementation of occupational health and safety programmes for health workers. World Health Organization.
13. World Health Organization & International Labour Organization. (2022b). Mental health at work: Policy brief. World Health Organization.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Mujanay Kalambo Alex, Senker Ndimba Bob, Mukadi Bamuleka Daniel, Hinson Antoine Vikkey, Kafinga Luzolo Emery
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
