Comparative Study of Open versus Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair (TAPP/TEP): A Prospective Observational Study at a Tertiary Care Centre in Jamshedpur
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51168/9neng345Keywords:
Inguinal hernia, Open mesh repair, Lichtenstein repair, Laparoscopic hernia repair, transabdominal preperitoneal, totally extraperitoneal, postoperative painAbstract
Background:
This study compared perioperative and postoperative outcomes of open Lichtenstein mesh repair with laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair using transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) or totally extraperitoneal (TEP) techniques.
Methods:
This prospective observational study included 100 patients with primary inguinal hernia treated at a tertiary care centre in Jamshedpur. Fifty patients underwent open Lichtenstein mesh repair and 50 underwent laparoscopic repair (tapp/tep). Demographic characteristics, operative duration, postoperative pain, hospital stay, complications, return to normal activity, and recurrence were assessed.
Results:
The mean age was 48.84 ± 13.26 years in the open group and 46.52 ± 12.71 years in the laparoscopic group. Males predominated in both groups (96% vs. 98%). The mean operative time was significantly longer with laparoscopic repair (76.34 ± 14.28 vs. 59.16 ± 12.41 minutes; p < 0.001). Postoperative pain was significantly lower (2.84 ± 0.92 vs. 4.96 ± 1.12; p < 0.001), hospital stay was shorter (2.12 ± 0.76 vs. 3.68 ± 1.08 days; p < 0.001), and return to normal activity was earlier (12.8 ± 3.4 vs. 19.7 ± 4.2 days; p < 0.001) with laparoscopic repair. Postoperative complications occurred in 20% versus 44% of patients (p = 0.010). Recurrence was comparable (2% vs. 4%; p = 0.558).
Conclusion:
Laparoscopic repair was associated with better postoperative recovery despite longer operative time.
Recommendation:
Laparoscopic repair may be considered in appropriately selected patients where appropriate expertise and infrastructure are available.
References
1. Rutkow im. Demographic and socioeconomic aspects of hernia repair in the United States. Surg Clin North Am. 1998;78(6):941-951. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-6109(05)70363-7
2. Primatesta p, goldacre mj. Inguinal hernia repair: Incidence of elective and emergency surgery, readmission and mortality. Lancet. 1996;347(9017):1104-1108. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/25.4.835
3. Kingsnorth AN, Leblanc KA. Hernias: Inguinal and incisional. Lancet. 2003;362(9395):1561-1571.
4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14746-0
5. Jenkins JT, O'Dwyer PJ. Inguinal hernias. Bmj. 2008;336(7638):269-272. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39450.428275.AD
6. Read RC. Metabolic factors in hernia formation. Hernia. 2004;8(3):175-178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-003-0197-y
7. Lichtenstein il, shulman ag, amid pk, montllor mm. The tension-free hernioplasty. Am J Surg. 1989;157(2):188-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9610(89)90526-6
8. Arregui me, Davis cj, Yucel O, Nagan rf. Laparoscopic mesh repair of inguinal hernia using a preperitoneal approach: A preliminary report. Surg Clin North Am. 1993;73(3):513-527. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-6109(16)46034-2
9. Bittner R, Arregui M, Bisgaard T, Dudai M, Ferzli gs, Fitzgibbons rj jr, et al. Guidelines for laparoscopic treatment of ventral and inguinal hernias. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(9):2773-2843. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1799-6
10. Félix el, michas ca, González mh jr. Laparoscopic hernioplasty: TAPP versus TEP. Surg Endosc. 1995;9(9):984-989. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00188456
11. Bringman s, ramel s, heikkinen tj, englund t, westman b, anderberg b. Tension-free inguinal hernia repair: Tep versus mesh-plug versus Lichtenstein. Br J Surg. 2003;90(2):155-160. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-200301000-00020
12. Mccormack k, scott nw, go pm, ross sj, grant am; eu hernia trialists collaboration. Laparoscopic techniques versus open techniques for inguinal hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;(1): CD001785.
13. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001785
14. Kuhry e, van veen rn, langeveld hr, steyerberg ew, jeekel j, bonjer hj. Open or endoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair? A systematic review. Hernia. 2007;11(4):289-296.
15. The HerniaSurge group. International guidelines for groin hernia management. Hernia. 2018;22(1):1-165.
16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-017-1668-x
17. Neumayer l, giobbie-hurder a, jonasson o, fitzgibbons rj jr, dunlop dd, gibbs jo, et al. Open mesh versus laparoscopic mesh repair of inguinal hernia. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(18):1819-1827.
18. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa040093
19. Eklund a, montgomery a, bergkvist l, rudberg c. Chronic pain 5 years after randomized comparison of laparoscopic and Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg. 2010;97(4):600-608. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.6904
20. Bansal vk, misra mc, babu d, singhal p, rao k, sagar r, et al. A prospective randomized comparison of long-term outcomes after laparoscopic and open inguinal hernia repair. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(11):4142-4149.
21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-2797-7
22. Bittner R, Schwarz J. Inguinal hernia repair: Current surgical techniques. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2012;397(2):271-282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-011-0875-7
23. Simons mp, Aufenacker T, bay-nielsen M, Campanelli G, Conze J, de Lange D, et al. European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients. Hernia. 2009;13(4):343-403.
24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-009-0529-7
25. Schmedt CG, Sauerland S, Bittner R. Comparison of endoscopic procedures versus Lichtenstein and other open mesh techniques for inguinal hernia repair: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surg Endosc. 2005;19(2):188-199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-004-9126-0
26. 2Pisanu A, Podda M, Saba A, Uccheddu A. Meta-analysis and review of prospective randomized trials comparing laparoscopic and Lichtenstein techniques in recurrent inguinal hernia repair. Hernia. 2015;19(3):355-366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-014-1281-1
27. Eu hernia trialists collaboration. Repair of groin hernia with synthetic mesh: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Br J Surg. 2002;89(12):1479-1482.
28. Karthikesalingam a, markar sr, holt pj, praseedom rk. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic with open mesh repair of recurrent inguinal hernia. Br J Surg. 2010;97(1):4-11. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.6902
29. Sajid ms, ladwa n, kalra l, hutson k, sains p, baig mk. A meta-analysis examining the use of tacker fixation versus no fixation of mesh in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Am J Surg. 2012;204(2):195-203.
30. 24. Phillips eh, arregui m, carroll bj, corbitt j, crafton wb, fallas mj, et al. Incidence of complications following laparoscopic hernioplasty. Surg Endosc. 1995;9(1):16-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00187878
31. Amid pk. Lichtenstein tension-free hernioplasty: Its inception, evolution, and principles. Hernia. 2004;8(1):1-7.
32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-003-0160-y
33. 26. Wantz GE. Experience with the tension-free hernioplasty for primary inguinal hernias in men. J Am Coll Surg. 1996;183(4):351-356.
34. 27. Ferzli gs, edwards ed, khoury ge. Laparoscopic extraperitoneal approach to recurrent inguinal hernia. Surg Endosc. 1994;8(8):933-936.
35. 28. Fitzgibbons rj jr, forse ra. Clinical practice. Groin hernias in adults. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(8):756-763. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMcp1404068
36. 29. Köckerling F, Bittner R, Jacob da, Seidelmann L, Keller T, Adolf D, et al. Tep versus Lichtenstein: Which technique is better for unilateral primary inguinal hernia repair? Surg Endosc. 2016;30(8):3304-3313.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4603-1
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Tushar Malua, Rani Khushboo, Neha Khushboo, Shital Malua

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.














